When my patients ask me for help with weight loss, one of the first things I tell them to do is to keep a food diary. There's great research that shows keeping a food diary is a fantastic tool for weight loss because it not only lets you see exactly how much you're eating, it also lets you assess where you might improve your diet—by getting more vegetables or legumes, for example.
The problem with keeping a written food diary, however, is that they can be extremely inaccurate. Studies vary in their estimates, but it seems that as many as half of all people keeping a food diary write down less than what they actually eat. Now, this doesn't necessarily mean that people aren't being honest. Often food diaries are filled out at the end of the day, counting on people being able to remember what they've eaten. (Be honest. After dinner tonight, are you going to remember that donut you ate in the break room this morning?)
Keeping a food diary online, on the other hand, seems to help people maintain their weight. Another tool that people seem to be using more and more is taking a photograph of their food before they eat it. Whole blogs are devoted to people's daily meals, in fact. Consumer behavior researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison decided to compare keeping a written food diary with keeping a photographic diary. Would one type of diary make people want to change their eating habits more than another? Would either actually have an effect on what people ate?
In a pilot study of just 43 people, the researchers distributed film cameras as well as paper food diaries to each person, instructing the participants to spend one week taking a photograph of everything they ate and also keeping a written, daily food diary.
At the start of the study the participants were interviewed, answering questions such as, "What do you typically eat on a day-to-day basis?" and "How healthy would you consider your eating habits to be?" At the close of the study the film they had taken was developed (the researchers note that digital cameras would likely have been a better choice). In an interview, the participant was asked to estimate how accurate their written record was, then they reviewed their photographic diary and their written diary with the interviewer.
While the majority of the participants actually preferred keeping a written food diary over a photographic diary, it appears that keeping a photographic diary was more accurate—and made people think twice about what they were eating before they actually ate it. "It did make me think a lot more about exactly what I was going to eat because I had to take a picture of it," one participant said. Other participants said that they chose not to have a snack or candy bar because it was "too much hassle" to record it. By contrast, the written diary allowed reflection about what the participant ate only after it had already been eaten.
All too often people eat on a sort of autopilot, letting their food choices be made on the fly. (Another reason to plan your meals ahead of time!) Photographing your food before you eat it can help you be more aware of what you are eating—and perhaps help you make better choices.
Here's some more information on the research on food diaries and how to get started.
Eat well, eat healthy, enjoy life!
Dr. Gourmet
For more information visit
The problem with keeping a written food diary, however, is that they can be extremely inaccurate. Studies vary in their estimates, but it seems that as many as half of all people keeping a food diary write down less than what they actually eat. Now, this doesn't necessarily mean that people aren't being honest. Often food diaries are filled out at the end of the day, counting on people being able to remember what they've eaten. (Be honest. After dinner tonight, are you going to remember that donut you ate in the break room this morning?)
In a pilot study of just 43 people, the researchers distributed film cameras as well as paper food diaries to each person, instructing the participants to spend one week taking a photograph of everything they ate and also keeping a written, daily food diary.
At the start of the study the participants were interviewed, answering questions such as, "What do you typically eat on a day-to-day basis?" and "How healthy would you consider your eating habits to be?" At the close of the study the film they had taken was developed (the researchers note that digital cameras would likely have been a better choice). In an interview, the participant was asked to estimate how accurate their written record was, then they reviewed their photographic diary and their written diary with the interviewer.
While the majority of the participants actually preferred keeping a written food diary over a photographic diary, it appears that keeping a photographic diary was more accurate—and made people think twice about what they were eating before they actually ate it. "It did make me think a lot more about exactly what I was going to eat because I had to take a picture of it," one participant said. Other participants said that they chose not to have a snack or candy bar because it was "too much hassle" to record it. By contrast, the written diary allowed reflection about what the participant ate only after it had already been eaten.
All too often people eat on a sort of autopilot, letting their food choices be made on the fly. (Another reason to plan your meals ahead of time!) Photographing your food before you eat it can help you be more aware of what you are eating—and perhaps help you make better choices.
Here's some more information on the research on food diaries and how to get started.
Eat well, eat healthy, enjoy life!
Dr. Gourmet
For more information visit
